<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lack of Quality PHP Tutorials??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stefashwell.com/2009/04/lack-of-quality-php-tutorials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stefashwell.com/2009/04/lack-of-quality-php-tutorials/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web Host Right</title>
		<link>http://www.stefashwell.com/2009/04/lack-of-quality-php-tutorials/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Host Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefashwell.com/?p=22#comment-258</guid>
		<description>I was just mentioning this somewhere else very recently regarding tutorials for php, im currently learning a range of stuff and php is on that list of things to learn, i see no end of great explanations on css, photoshop, jquery etc but less on php.

My first php tutorial that i did a few nights ago, from a well known tuts site had missing code and mistakes within it, i was suprised at myself at being able to spot this and fixed the problems, but i was equally suprised at the tut being put out there without the author/publisher checking it first.

I have been advised to read the php manual and im starting that tonight, but i have that feeling of where do i start, lol, for a complete beginner it&#039;s slightly intimidating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just mentioning this somewhere else very recently regarding tutorials for php, im currently learning a range of stuff and php is on that list of things to learn, i see no end of great explanations on css, photoshop, jquery etc but less on php.</p>
<p>My first php tutorial that i did a few nights ago, from a well known tuts site had missing code and mistakes within it, i was suprised at myself at being able to spot this and fixed the problems, but i was equally suprised at the tut being put out there without the author/publisher checking it first.</p>
<p>I have been advised to read the php manual and im starting that tonight, but i have that feeling of where do i start, lol, for a complete beginner it&#8217;s slightly intimidating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Unglamorous PHP Thoughts - StefAshwell.com</title>
		<link>http://www.stefashwell.com/2009/04/lack-of-quality-php-tutorials/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>More Unglamorous PHP Thoughts - StefAshwell.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefashwell.com/?p=22#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] the office today a discussion started around my blog post from yesterday (Lack of PHP Tutorials??) and we decided to post on a few forums to see if there was anything we were missing. Seems not. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the office today a discussion started around my blog post from yesterday (Lack of PHP Tutorials??) and we decided to post on a few forums to see if there was anything we were missing. Seems not. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.stefashwell.com/2009/04/lack-of-quality-php-tutorials/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefashwell.com/?p=22#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I agree, php.net is a great resource, however it&#039;s not very... exciting. I&#039;ve taught bits and bobs of PHP to people before and always recommend php.net to them, but they don&#039;t use it because of the way it&#039;s laid out. It&#039;s daunting. Take Ruby on Rails as an example, its just all presented in a much nicer way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, php.net is a great resource, however it&#8217;s not very&#8230; exciting. I&#8217;ve taught bits and bobs of PHP to people before and always recommend php.net to them, but they don&#8217;t use it because of the way it&#8217;s laid out. It&#8217;s daunting. Take Ruby on Rails as an example, its just all presented in a much nicer way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerberos</title>
		<link>http://www.stefashwell.com/2009/04/lack-of-quality-php-tutorials/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerberos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefashwell.com/?p=22#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Although I cannot comment on web tutorials, having never really looked very hard, I&#039;ve always found the php.net official online help is unparalelled in its utility.  Plus there is generally a decent code sample to do roughly what you are trying to do somewhere in the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I cannot comment on web tutorials, having never really looked very hard, I&#8217;ve always found the php.net official online help is unparalelled in its utility.  Plus there is generally a decent code sample to do roughly what you are trying to do somewhere in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
